Showing posts with label Classic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Classic. Show all posts

Monday, March 14, 2011

Radiohead - OK Computer

Radiohead - OK Computer
Published in 1997

OK Computer marks the moment in Radiohead's career where they stepped off the path and found a goldmine. The album begins in a wholly different way than either of their previous albums.  We are treated to a cello and bells, playing a melody that would sound completely out of place on either of the previous records.  This is the first indication that we are now in a new space.

Airbag, the albums first track, is one of the greatest songs to lead off an album ever.  It is a wide open, strikingly beautiful track, that is inviting and interesting.  The themes of the album are hit on, but the song is just well made and well performed.  No longer are we relying on pure guitar and bass to convey the music, there are synths, strings, drum machines and much more.  The guitar is present, and the bass is pounding, but they are awash in extra touches around the main parts.

Lyrically, Airbag is a sing along song about a car crash, the effects of modernity and the interaction of man and technology.  This is the theme of the album.  In a world where nothing is separated from technology, what happens is recorded, seen, processed and filtered through this technology.  Music is a powerful thing in this world, because it seems to be the one place where technology cannot touch, but as Radiohead shows, it has already permeated the gap, and is now in charge.

Paranoid Android is another classic song.  The bass line is beautiful, the acoustic touch brings an interesting sound on top of it, and to also have an electric guitar come in just adds to the depth of the song.  The music is well performed, the sounds are beautiful, and Thom Yorke screams and shouts with the best of them.  The song progresses from one point in musical space to another, first starting as a bass and acoustic song, developing into a rock anthem, slowing down into a ballad, and returning to the anthem.  These tonal changes make the song develop into much greater than the sum of its parts.

In general, Thom Yorke alternates between a breathy whisper and singing right at the edge of his vocal range, threatening to  either go into falsetto, or playing just on that side of the vocals.  This means that his voice is dynamically attempting to move up and over a certain point, and the failure of the voice to do so intrigues us and brings us further into the song.  The exploitation of this natural feature of the human voice is one of the most brilliant things that Yorke can do.

Subterranean Homesick Alien is a song about longing for a greater experience.  The desire to see something from a different perspective and from a different place is a common one in Radiohead's music.  The voyeuristic elements are also interesting to look at.  Both the aliens and the singer are trying to present the people back home with a different perspective, the aliens in the form of home movies and the singer in the form of words.  Both of these experiences highlight the superficial elements of relating experience to another.  The movies, by definition are only an image of the experience at that time, which divorces them from the time and place that they are being viewed, and can only be experienced fully through the memory of creating them, while the narrative is flawed in that in the end, it must sound crazy to the other people around.  Once again, disconnection from human beings reigns.

Exit Music (For a Film) is another song about attempting to find connection and failing.  The singer is attempting to escape with someone else, and the song is presented as a narrative between this character and the singer.  The quietly whispered quality of the vocals and the layers of music present a strangely conspiratorial sound, that makes the song sound like it is being sung to you alone.  Even as the song expands, it remains a shared experience between you and the singer, a quiet rebellion, huddled in the woods around a fire, having escaped from an oppressive thing.  

There are two parts to Exit Music (For a Film) of equal importance.  First is the Wake and Escape part.  This establishes the narrative quality.  The song is communicated directly to us, the listener, and we are treated as the child in the relationship.  The imagery that is called to mind is of a hushed night time escape, running away from an oppressive force, that has held on too long.  The escape is cathartic and  triumphant.

The second part begins just after the line "Sing us a Song, a Song to keep us warm, there is such a chill, such a chill." At this moment, the heavily distorted baseline comes in.  The song that is sung is one of rebellion toward the force that once held us.  It is a revolutionary anthem, sung between conspirators against an oppressive figure that doesn't present itself to them.  However, this triumphant quality is stamped out by the end of the song, with the repeated refrain "We hope that you choke, that you choke, that you choke" sung in a quiet, high voice, like a child hiding in the woods.  The epic rebellion is only between this child and the original singer, and the hope is one of futility and sadness.  Sitting outside, escaped from the house, not yet to anywhere that could take you in, the end sounds like the oppressive darkness chokes off the lone voice in the cold world.

(Did that just get really dark?  I think it was a little dark.  My fault.)

Let Down is a lovely song, mixing the classic Radiohead sound with a lovely wash of noise effect.  The background has a constant sound of cymbals, which allows the guitar and vocals to ring out over the background, and even the bass comes through clearly.  There are several small repeated samples that make an impact, and the added noise is not distracting, but adds to the wash in a way that makes it interesting.  The main through line, which sounds like marimba to me, but might just be an electric piano, gives a great sound to the whole thing.

Perhaps the most popular song off of OK Computer, Karma Police was ubiquitous on alternative radio for a year or so.  It's a haunting song of great sing along lyrics.  The music once again takes advantage of the layers available, allowing a wailing vocal track in the background.  The piano based chorus segment drops well, and brings the listener in closer to the band.  The space created by the re-entry of the drums allows the effect to occur over and over again.

The bridge, with it's cries of "for a minute there, I lost myself" is well done, sounds like the other parts, and allows a strange guitar non-solo.  The guitar solo sounds more like a repeated alarm sound, not a solo, but it comes through at the moment when you expect the solo to occur.  It is then dwarfed at the end of the song by the lead in to Fitter Happier.

If I were to point to something that bothers me from this album, it would be Fitter Happier.  I think I understand why they used it, but now, over ten years later, the idea of a MC Hawking solo in the middle of this album seems absurd.  However, the background music is pretty incredible, and it allows this not to stick out like a sore thumb.  It is less distracting and thematically fits, I just wish that it wasn't so obvious.  Having human words come out of a robots mouth is a little too easy for me.

Electioneering  (I believe that the title comes from a Kurosawa film called Ikiru, which might be my favorite film of all time.) is a great rock song.  It's simply amazing, driving rock.  It is the closest thing to a normal song structure on this album, but it is just a driving monster song.  The music is well done, the guitar is awesome, and the drums just kick.  It is perhaps the easiest song to just listen to without context, but in context, it gives it a certain power that it is so simple.  The song structure is simple, but the song is not.  The lyrics are powerfully crafted, and the music is too.

Climbing Up the Walls is a pretty great song.  I think the beginning is more powerful than the end, and that it loses it's way somewhere halfway, but I think that it is a pretty fair representation of the insanity and desire that consumes people.  It's a fantastically well done beginning though, and totally fits inside the album, because the outro of buzzes and noises brings us into the prettiest song on the album

No Surprises is a perfect song.  The song is light and poppy sounding, with incredibly dark and strange lyrics. It has a lullaby quality to it, and a bit of a sing songy vibe to it.  The music is just perfectly beautiful and completely detoothed, which allows the lyrics to be biting and vicious.  If it is a lullaby, it is the lullaby that is sung to budding anarchists and criminals, a song of theft and destruction, a prayer to the god of the thieves.  It's also wonderful.

Lucky has a dreamlike quality.  The slow tempo allows the vocals to languish in the time, making the music that much sweeter.  The chorus kicks in with one of the most moving and singable lines from the album, with the note on "pull" almost being drawn out of you, involuntarily.  The song is performed with a tightness and clarity that many other artists lack.  It's a beautiful moment of dreamy clarity.

The Tourist is even slower in tempo than Lucky, and is almost so slow that it forces you to anticipate the beat.  The chorus of the song directly addresses this with "Hey man, slow down, slow down, slow down."  The main vocal sections are sung in harmony between two voices, allowing the snaking between these voices to create tension, and the music to interact with the voices.  It's a beautifully done piece of music.

So, why is OK Computer one of the most important albums of the last twenty years?  I think it is because it looks both forward and back.  It has a structure that is similar to the Dark Side of the Moon, which was a meditation on madness, while this is a meditation on Technology and Humanity.  I think that if it were not for this album, the musical landscape would have lost the diverse epic structure, and I think that we would be worse off for it.

I also think that it is important to remember how different this was than The Bends and Planet Telex.  "We have removed the traditional song structure, and are no longer aping the people who inspired us."  The imagery of stepping off the path is a good one.  The first two albums, while incredibly respectable pieces of work, were in line with what other bands would have done.  For that matter, nearly every album is similar to every other album that artist has done.  When we make something successful, the "that but more" principle comes into effect.  This is why some people get locked into structures, and instead of using the structure to build something new, they just build the same house over and over again.

Radiohead, by stepping this way, opened up an entirely new path for them to go.  Few bands have tried to go in such a different direction, and even fewer have succeeded, but this is a stellar effort.  To adopt this kind of change shows maturity in a musician, and it allows them to move to even newer places.  OK Computer was the first step, but the next one would be even further.

"That's a lot of scalps,"
Matt

PS. Yeah, another one bites the dust!  This will be posted on Wednesday, so, whenever you check TAP, make sure to check other times too.  Not only does it bump my view count and thus my ego, it also means that you get more TAP!

PPS. GP5!

PPPS.  Stay tuned for more of the Catalog Project!  Up next, Kid A and Amnesiac and blowing your mind.

Friday, January 28, 2011

The Ink Spots - The Very Best of the Ink Spots


The Ink Spots - The Very Best of the Ink Spots
Published (various) 1939-1952

1. iPod!

So, to get this part out of the way. I first learned about the Ink Spots because of a video game.  The game is called Fallout, and it is one of the finest post apocalyptic worlds that has ever been created. The premise is that shortly after WWII there was a major nuclear incident which was only survived by mutants on the surface and people who lived in Vaults. This alternate history continued using what was popular culture around the time of the incident and the juxtaposition of the destroyed world and the old music is actually quite effective.

Over the opening credits of fallout 1, 2 and 3 an Ink Spots song plays. Each one of them was moving and beautiful. So, I did some searching and found their compilation album.   Now the question should be asked, do greatest hits albums fit the structure of the project?

Probably not, but I have some shit to say about it anyway.

The compilation is both the easiest album in the world and the most likely to go completely off the rails. Here is why: given that you are able to solely pick from your greatest hits, you should be able to construct an album that hits every high note from your career. However it is in no way guaranteed that the nuance of the song will hold up in the new context. For instance, maybe your second hit doesn't hold a candle to your first, and that quickly becomes apparent when you hear them back to back. Or maybe the reason that song was so well received was because of the prevailing musical attitude at the time, and your gimmick no longer works.

Whatever the reason, it is difficult in this context to make your music heard as if both new and interesting. A potential album project and excellent effort is the Rolling Stones, who's 40 licks gives an excellent picture of the band and their development (or lack thereof, if you talk to some) is fully on display.

The Ink Spots get off easy in this case. I mean, I couldn't even find one of their records if I tried, and when I say record I mean record. I have no context for these songs other than the context on this disc and my personal emotional stake in the few songs I knew going in. I'm happy to report though, that the music is spectacular and will make you enjoy the retro nature. These songs, some of which are covers, are, to a song, done well.  They are toe tapping, finger snapping good. They are fun, funny upbeat and even romantic.

What you must remember going into this album is that there was once a time when it was considered inappropriate to tell a woman " you're a crazy bitch, but you fuck so good I'm on top of it".  I know, shocking right?  There was once a time in America when the first thing out of a singers mouth was not "shake that ass".  This was an ancient time when men could say things that may have even approached respect toward a woman without fear of public castration or Justin Beiber comparisons.

This innocence is the source of two things. 1. Grandpa-itis, which makes older men say things like you damn kids don't know what you're doing and get the he'll off my lawn, and 2. Me liking this album. What can insay, I'm a romantic at heart, and hearing "I don't want to set the world on fire, I just want to start a flame in yur heart" pulls a cheap and easy tab on my heart. It's so silly and easy that it seems corny, until you realize how good they are.

The harmonies are on like a large barrel throwing primate. The music, while simple, makes it's presence felt, and gets out of the way. The singing and speaking are very good, and it's all around a great album. However, it should absolutely be optional.

In some songs, it is just too silly for words. Sometimes they get carried away, and some people will just think it's corny crap. However, if Maybe and I don't want to set the world on fire have some effect on you, you should get your heart checked out, tin man.

Nobody to thank this week, so thank you Fallout teams past and present, and the Ink Spots.

How you ever hear yourself thinking with all that sloshing around amazes me, meatbag.
Matt

PS - Arctic Monkeys are up next.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

The Who - Who's Next


The Who - Who's Next
Published in 1971

I'm writing this album project from my iPod, so if I mess anything up, that is why.  There are advantages and disadvantages to this approach. I have a four hour trip to Busan, South Korea, and if I can get some of these projects done on the trip, I'll not feel like a complete price of dirt.

However, there is the speed of typing issue, and catching up to these songs can be a bit hard. Especially when you are talking about a band as driving and great as The Who.

Who's Next is a classic for many reasons, and as a person who enjoys albums it's hard to not just gush all over it.  Listening to this album is like listening to your favorite classic rock station, because this is just a plain awesome classic album.

Interestingly, at least to me, it is not a incredibly hard album. I know, this was a simpler time, when a rock album could have things like feelings and ideas without being an emo scream cry whine fest.   What happened? Why did we leave this behind?  This classic has the same classic problem that most classics have, though, which is that it sounds a bit cliched. But, of course,  that is beacause it has been blatently ripped off and stolen from.

It's suprisingly gentle for a rock album. It's not about distruction and death, but it is about singing and finding. It's quiet and reflects some of their later experiments (ugh, nothing sounds as pretentious as saying 'experiments' when talking about music) with epic length stories and songs.  You never feel lostin these longer songs thoug, but whether that is because they stick to the formula well or because the quality of the songwriting leads you through the song.

I cannot tell if The Who are just an enigma or if they are actually what they appear to be.  What I mean is, are they actually as pensive as their songs would lead us to believe, or are they just trying to present themselves that way?  It's actually a question that I have about a lot of these classic albums.  Everyone says that the state of music has gotten simpler and dumber over the past 45? 50? years, and that when they were kids, the music used to mean something, man.  Which sounds like a huge load or bullshit to me, because some of these songs are very pedestrian in content, but would probably be hailed as 'better songwriting' than most of the modern music. I have a theory though.

What I think most influences a musical group is what is permissable in the culture surrounding us.  The role of the art, according to the eminent philosopher Douglas Adams said, is to hold up a mirror to the world and show it itself.  The world was less permissible in certain areas, so the band was reflecting a fundamentally different surface than the one that we see today. My point is not that The Who would be singing Linkin Park songs or something today, but that the classic rock that they perform is another form of nostalgia that we indulge in. We find the mirrors of the past to be smaller and easier to look at then he ones that are reflecting our own time, especially when we can see them as great.

This mirror is one of my favorite classic rock albums. Baba O'Riley and Won't Get Fooled Again are two songs that can bring the house down, no matter where yuu are, and even CSI: Miami cannot ruin that scream for me.  It's a moment of glorious anticipation, feinting and darting, coming up and finally satisfying you.  Much like this album.

Anyway, this is probably a not optional album, but the not optional nature is implied by it's classic nature.  I don't have anyone to thank for this one, so I'll just link you to the Seoul Survivors website www.survivorsrfc.com and tell you how it goes.

We all know Sanchez was a loose cannon,
Matt

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Led Zeppelin - Led Zeppelin IV


Led Zeppelin - Led Zeppelin IV
Published in 1971
Welcome back to TAP: Classics, where we expand your mind, body, and soul by writing literally hundreds of words about albums that almost everyone has already heard and given consensus that it is awesome and add our two cents to that amazingly large pile of money that has accumulated, stacking upon itself on list after list of best album evars and top rock and roll albums, and whatever else you think of.

I have to say, I'm not actually that excited to talk about Led Zeppelin IV here.  First, about what I am calling it, I know that the album doesn't officially have a name, so I have decided to go with the common convention and just call it Led Zeppelin IV.  But the real reason that I am not that excited to talk about it is because this is one of the grounds that has been tread over and over by people, and it's obvious what the strengths and weaknesses are of this album.  If you hate Stairway to Heaven, you will hate this whole album.  It has a real JRR Tolkien, Lord of the Rings, fantasy vibe to it, and if that is not your cup of tea, then this will not be the cup of tea for you.

However, I promised that I would pump out some words about this album, so I'm going to.  I think that the way in here is the difference between digital media and analog media, and how the switch has made some interesting and strange changes to what we call an album today.

Ever since I was pretty young, there has been an optical data storage and retrieval system.  What this means is that the whole thing is based on a piece of round plastic being spun around at a pretty quick pace with a laser sweeping across it.  The system was created to hold a great deal more information on a bit by bit level than an  analog data storage and retrieval system.  This system traditionally was used in two areas.  One, computer data storage, where a magnetic tape was run forwards and backwards in a programmed sucession to retrieve data, preceded by punched cards that were just a very early optical storage system.  Two, audio storage, which also used magnetic tape for a while, which moved a tape over a magnetic head which read the bits and converted them to audio, which was preceded by a thing called a record.

A record is an interesting thing.  It's a round bit of pressed plastic with a continuous groove running in a spiral from the inside to the outside.  (Anyone older than me is rolling their eyes at this description, anyone younger is rolling their eyes at how stupid this was.)  The groove was pressed to different depths, and was traced over by a needle, which was set vibrating by the grooves, and produced sound on the other end.  This was the technology for a really really really surprisingly long time. Just to be clear, the first time this technology was used, a guy named Thomas Edison shouted his favorite nursery rhyme into it, and played it back.

The record is amazingly better than it's predecessor though.  The predecessor was a thing that took in large amounts of energy, could completely go off the chart, was highly inconvenient to pack up and carry, required free drinks at parties, and cared how you looked at it when it played funny.  These were called live people, and while they are really good for parties, they were somewhat inconvenient at parties, especially when there were limited amounts of drinks.  I'm not saying that a good party can't have a live band, but these considerations must be put into ones mind.

The record had some drawbacks too though.  For it's orders of magnitude better portability, it was somewhat limited by the fact that it could only play the songs that were on it at that time, and couldn't change any of the songs.  It was also pretty weak against water and fire based attacks (seriously, a pokemon joke, oh my god, I want to shoot myself for that one), and, in fact, it wasn't all that portable.  It took a lot of them to have a wide variety of songs, two turntables to keep them going constantly, and we're always getting scratched or fucked up by drunk friends (or so I hear, and am told by movies).

The format is to have a certain length of time on one side, followed by a certain length of time on the other side.  These two grooves are unchanging, and they play the same songs every time, only changing with the wear on the record.  The analog interaction between needle and record slowly wore away the fineness of the grooves over time, and gave the tones an interesting, warm sound that is desirable to many people.

Why am I talking about this in association with Led Zeppelin IV?  Because this is a record on which you can hear the two distinct sides, even today.  The first four songs are one side, and the second four songs are the other side.  They are carefully picked and put together that way, and it makes sense for them to go in that order.  The record has a natural ebb and flow and a very natural division.  I think it speaks to the difference in thought between a record, which is naturally two sided, and a cd, which is a one sided, front to back affair.  If you want to draw something on one side of a piece of paper, it's all there, there is no need to look at the other side, but to make one side flow into the other side takes skill and dedication.  

This is a great album, one that should be listened to.  Stairway must have been an amazing experiment at the time, because it is hard to not joke about it now.  It's a moving interesting record, from Black Dog, all the way through When the Levee Breaks.  It has many blues and rock influences, and is obviously an influence for a lot of bands to come.  But it is mostly, in my mind, a demonstration in the fact that making a record and making a cd are different processes, and have a different goal in a lot of ways.  Maybe the amount of data that is given to the producers of music is not a more is better proposition, but that more is more.  

Anyway, it's something to think about.  I want to thank Led Zeppelin for giving me a context to talk about all of this in, and you for reading it.  Also, I want to put the call out for more albums.  If this project is going to go for five days a week for however long it goes, I need two albums a week from the masses.  I'm covered for the next couple of weeks, but some more suggestions and more variation is always a good thing.

Next time, Gadget, Next time.
Matt